Even with your infallable mime jr idea, there's no way lostgar is gonna have a good sp matchup. Sp has to take like 1 or 2 prizes before all 6 pokes are put in the lost zone (very easy). almost any start with a cyrus can take a prize by turn two and deafen by turn 3. All of your arguments for lostgar require it to have an extremely inconsisten list. New sp lists could run 3-4 sp radar making it easy to keep pokes out of your hand. This makes your deck rely on seeker. You can't compete with luxchomp while using a seeker as a supporter every turn. Especially not if yer under deafan lock (no trainers or decent supporters leaves your total set up ability to... well... set up. Power Spray?
Back to the inconsistency topic: palkia g, a large stage 2 line, too many seekers, mew prime, maybe ditto, spiritomb TM, bad stadiums.
By the way, please only comment on the deck's flow/consistency if you've already tested it against decent sp players
---------- Post added 01/19/2011 at 05:45 PM ----------
Anybody not playing an Azelf x in their lostgar is stupid.
How can you make this statement and expect to be taken seriously. Lost Zone isn't even out yet. Even if you have tested your lostgar deck against your friends, I doubt you know the deck as well as you seem to think.
Personally, I agree with your underlying message: Azelf x is good in lostgar. But until we give the deck time to settle into the format, no one knows if it is an
essential card. Who knows, maybe there will be a much better tech that pervades the format. One that is not a dark attacker.
Also, what if the best lostgar deck turns out to be one that relies on mew putting your own gengar in the lost zone? stopping the weakness of your 60 hp attacker is not worth that card slot.
My point is that we are all completely ignorant of lostgar or other lost world decks, so umbrella statements like that have zero value right now.