Marril said:I'd ask the same of Zero Hax, in all honesty.
...except that you're the confessed troll, and he actually tries to converse about things with the other people in the thread on-topic?
Sour grapes, miss?
Marril said:I'd ask the same of Zero Hax, in all honesty.
Tagrineth said:...except that you're the confessed troll
Marril said:Apparently not, as after I posted the explanation at first you still thought I was saying down-smash was a more "original" move.
Marril said:You've incorporated Marth's down-smash and Counter into your game for long enough to make any kind of judgement call on it?
Marril said:Or the secret third option, which is "ignore Marril."
Marril said:I'm saying that if a pro says something you don't expect a pro to say, you won't believe him, instead of reasoning out why it doesn't sound like what you want to hear. That shows a closed mind.
Marril said:I have no delusions of being an innocent little flower, but I also have no delusions about the fact that, quite honestly, forums aren't any different from high school in one respect: People act justified in demonizing the ones they don't like. "Bashing Marril is justified!" isn't a binary statement, there are times when I've earned it, and times when quite frankly I haven't.
Marril said:I underestimated the reaction people would give to being told they were rampantly abusing a bug.
Marril said:So what if it's a bug? I abuse it shamelessly!" It seems I was wrong.
Marril said:I imagine removing wavedashing would count as "****ing it up".
Look up Kazze no Kizzu 2 on Google Video. He does it a few times.
Looked it up. And air dodge could easily prevent any of those KOs?
Has anyone heard of a wave dash? if anyone has, please provide URL for a video if it exist. And how do you do it?
Too bad, word your initial statement better next time; I recall it having 'original' in it - since your revised criteria for a usable move is apparently 'a move that shows originality.'
I'm only a former Marth player who used to play PC and Wes monthly - does this not indicate personal experience?
Or an option you could've chosen at the start; don't post.
Your arguments are becoming sheer speculation. =\
Zero Hax said:I don't care if you underestimated my reactions, you came in here with the sole intent to troll just as you did in another melee thread.
Marril said:No, trolling wasn't my goal this time around, and it certainly wasn't my goal to destroy the thread.
Translation: "I want my opponents to give up the argument from square one."
Quote me expressing my hope for wavedashing to be in brawl.
No, wavedashes don't exist. The entire basis for this 20+ page argument between Hax and Marril is a lie.
However the competeitive Melee community doesn't care about small time opinions such as complaints about the abuse of a bug and such.
...
"If you aren't a famous tournament winner, screw off."
It's actually like the English community in a way. If you aren't a famous writer, nobody in it will give you the time of day, but if you are, everyone takes your opinion as fact.
Marril said:...
You know what? I'm just going to assume you don't have the capacity to understand what I'm saying, as my "revised criteria" has nothing like that, as I've said multiple times before. Moving on...
Marril said:I'll note you didn't actually answer the question.
Marril said:"Look at me, I can imitate Marril!"
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery...
Marril said:And your, "You can't wavedash" isn't?
Marril said:How would it have been "giving up"? Wavedashing being a bug is no less objectively true than MissingNo. being one, and yet there are those who shamelessly admit to using that. It's everyone's irrational needs to somehow justify their actions, to convince everyone that they don't resort to bug abuse to win, that forces them to argue with me in this thread.
Marril said:I'll get right on it after you get me those back-ordered quotes I asked for pages ago proving wavedashing isn't a bug.