Clearea Vystein
Active Member
Try it once. it's not as hard as you would think :thumb:
Is it as hard as "Pick Up 60"?
Try it once. it's not as hard as you would think :thumb:
Vegeta ss4 said:So Jackal, what you are saying is if I am worrying about having my opponent damage my sleeves I shouldn't use the nice ones?
Does that make sense to you? Many love the look of the cool sleeves. So we should NOT buy the good sleeves because we have to factor in our opponent damaging them because they have the right to shuffle my deck.
Many love the look of the cool sleeves. So we should NOT bring the good sleeves to large tournaments because we have to factor in our opponent damaging them because they have the right to shuffle my deck.
So Jackal, what you are saying is if I am worrying about having my opponent damage my sleeves I shouldn't use the nice ones?
Does that make sense to you? Many love the look of the cool sleeves. So we should NOT buy the good sleeves because we have to factor in our opponent damaging them because they have the right to shuffle my deck.
Pokemon needs to fix this issue, shouldn't be allowed. If you feel your opponent is cheating, its called cut or have a judge shuffle it.
Once again, I'm going to make the point that shuffling your opponents deck is cheating. Most people that shuffle flip the cards to their side, thus allowing them to see the deck. I guess you could try and make the point of SotG would playy here in which we should assume you wouldn't look at the deck, but it works the other way in lack of trust off the opponent whom you are shuffling his deck.
Let's fix this, cut and cut only. Now, I have had people shuffle cut my deck in tournies, but they asked if they could and asked how id want them to shuffle to protect my Gold Pikachu sleeves.
Posted with Mobile style...
Tournament Rules said:20. Shuffling
Each player’s deck is expected to be fully randomized at the start of each game and during the game, as card effects require. In order to achieve randomness, players are allowed to riffle, pile, or otherwise shuffle their decks until they are satisfied that the deck is random. Randomization must be done in the presence of the player’s opponent and must be done in a reasonable amount of time. Care should be taken to assure that the cards in the deck are not harmed or revealed during the shuffle.
After the shuffle, the deck must be offered to the player’s opponent to be cut once. Cutting the deck consists of creating two separate stacks of cards by removing a portion of the top of the deck, and then placing it under the remaining portion. Players should take care to not reveal any of their opponent’s cards while cutting. Cutting into more than two stacks is considered a shuffle.
Instead of cutting, the opponent may choose to shuffle the deck. This shuffle should be brief, and when it concludes, the deck’s owner is allowed to cut the deck once as described above. Players should take
care when shuffling an opponent’s deck, as the cards in that deck are not the shuffling player’s property. At this point, the deck should be sufficiently randomized to both players’ satisfaction.
If either player still does not feel that either deck is sufficiently randomized, or if a player wishes to not offer his or her deck to an opponent for randomization, a judge must be called over to shuffle the deck(s) in question. No player is allowed to shuffle or cut after the judge’s shuffle.
Players engaging in questionable shuffling methods may be subject to the Unsporting Conduct section of the Penalty Guidelines. Players are strongly encouraged to shuffle their opponent’s deck at Premier Events.
Put your hand in the air, and in the loudest voice you can muster, go with one single word...
JUDGE!!!
It's more amusing to me when someone shuffles my deck....There's a player at my league who does this, and it seems a bit ridiculous most of the time considering:
A) I run the league, I have more to lose than anyone if I stacked my deck
B) I don't have to stack my deck to win
C) What do you accomplish with a shuffle over a cut? My deck is randomized after both, so why waste both of our time.
The ONLY time I can see shuffling your opponents deck are when they literally do 1-2 mash shuffles which is insufficient. If you just watch me shuffle for 20-30 seconds, don't take another 15-25 to shuffle them again. I WILL cut it and continue my turn.
The best remedy to an opponent shuffling your deck is shuffle theirs EVERY time and keep a prize lead. They'll cut it out when they see they are going to lose on time because they're more concerned with shuffling your deck.
This is an unfair view of it. Your opponent doesn't do it to eat up time, (and it isn't like it takes forever anyway) they do it because its a good habit to keep up as it makes cheating harder, and I'm not saying that everyone's a cheater, but you never know who could be a cheater, and therefore it's a good way to make sure your never caught off guard. It's a safeguard. If you feel differently about it, then that's fine. Shuffle your opponent's deck out of spite, you're well with in your rights to do so.
It's not out of spite, it's merely to reflect how pointless it is. You can tell if someone is stacking while they shuffle. They can't be looking through the deck while they shuffle. If you see me shuffling my cards face down for 20-25 seconds, then I'm obviously not cheating. I can understand shuffling your opponent's deck in top cut if you're paranoid, but other than that, just cut it, and CHANGE where you cut each time. Saves time, provides more time playing...which is what I came to do.
I did an experiment the other day. I took 60 pokemon cards and marked them 1 through 60. I shuffled a good amount and examined the deck - I was shocked to see how little they had changed and how clumped they were. (I'd suggest everyone try this sometime - it's very interesting)
I then re-ordered and 6-piled. Then I proceeded to shuffle. The difference was amazing!
Point being - I do not trust shuffling as much as I trust 6-piling.
As for me, I like giving my opponent's deck a little shuffle...