Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

What can you get banned for?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can do 33,320 in one attack that isn't a "Flip til you get tails" attack. That's the most we could come up with. (Props to Tom)

Lawman: by that same token, is the Gym seen the same way? Are we just "Lafonte" players when something negative happens to a member who is also a Gym member, but when it is something positive they are seen as Gym members? There can't be a double standard.
 
Last edited:
AHA! Moss did't say legal! We can use old cards, cool.

Ralts
Candy
Gardevoir ex
Plus
56 energy(-1 for prize)
560, plus their Nidoran Female with 58 energy attatched to it, That comes to 1140, add 4 plus powers, and we are playing by the old rules, so 4 old dark energys and a stregnth charm, that comes out to 1230, double that for weakness, 2460. That's really all I got.

33480?
come on. I'll be looking for it:wink:


EDIT: Gah, I just keep going off-topic all the time now. Well, it's like someone else said. If you win, Lafonte invites you, and if you are good, you keep winning.
 
Moss Factor said:
Clay: I have a lot of the local judges and adults who come to tournaments come to me asking for help with their son or daughter's deck, and I always give them honest advice. I don't live in an area with organized local tournaments currently, but before I went off to college I regularly helped many 10- and 11-14 kids with their decks. .

Moss seems to always love to talk about strategerie :) He (in his oh so humble way) enjoys looking at any type of deck. Iam sure that he learns from helping.

His comments above are fact.
 
Moss Factor said:
You can do 33,480 in one attack that isn't a "Flip til you get tails" attack. That's the most we could come up with. (Props to Tom)

Lawman: by that same token, is the Gym seen the same way? Are we just "Lafonte" players when something negative happens to a member who is also a Gym member, but when it is something positive they are seen as Gym members? There can't be a double standard.

No Mossy, like the "Facts of Life" theme...when you are part of a group, you take the bad, you take the good.

Keith
 
So if 'Lafonte' is causing a problem and making an image, WHAT is it?Ok ONE person got banned for two years ONE person.So that's obviously not all of us.
 
We DO have a way of doing the 33,320 in one attack that isn't a "Flip till you get tails." :D

The sad thing is that our BEST PLAYERS are banned from the 'Gym, and therefore DO NOT have dual membership. SOLELY lafonte.
 
Rulemaster said:
The sad thing is that our BEST PLAYERS are banned from the 'Gym, and therefore DO NOT have dual membership. SOLELY lafonte.
The sad thing is that they chose for that to happen.
The rules of the Gym are well known and perm bans don't happen for just breaking them once, unless it's really way over the line.
 
I think Jason should be let back on. He has a laptop he leaves on and brings to friends' houses often. What he "did" to get banned was completely out of character for Jason. It is clear someone just got on his account. He should be let back on.


Matt: Actually Chuck and I DO have membership on the Gym :D
 
Moss Factor said:
I think Jason should be let back on. He has a laptop he leaves on and brings to friends' houses often. What he "did" to get banned was completely out of character for Jason. It is clear someone just got on his account. He should be let back on.
We plan on sitting down with him at Nats to discuss it.
 
Don't we have another topic about all the "top players" that don't have invites? (DOES IT!)

OK, enough of that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top