I have to agree with Mondak on this one. Worlds should have the best players in the World there not the best of the players that can afford it. I would much rather see 8-12 payed invites than 25+ unpayed. jmo
I agree, but that isn't going to happen.
"Worlds should have the best players in the World..." But only so many get invites, right? How can the best players in the world be at worlds if only a small percentage of players from this country get to play in it?
"Not the best of the players that can afford it." Yet money plays a huge role in attending multiple battle roads, multiple cities, multiple states, regionals, and nationals (wherever it is).
"I would rather see 8-12 payed invites than 25+ unpayed." How are the best players in the world better represented by less people getting invites?
I don't disagree or agree with the ideas your proposing, I just feel some of the ideas are kind of ironic. You want better represenation, yet want less invites. You don't want the game to revolve around those that have $$$ yet a player has to have the best cards to do well and has to be able to attend many events to earn a rating invite.
In my own opinion, I'd like to see less invites given out through the grinder. If that isn't the ultimate sign of $$$ advantage, I don't know what is.