No its not, like Bullados say there is 280 some. And some very low competive areas. Read the winners and there always a few of those "how did that top cut decks" Everybody and there mom (mine has
) has top cut a cities.
Top Cutting or even winning a cities won't instantly shoot a deck to teir 1. Unless wins multible cities in multible areas. What do you think is going to happen Salamence wins a cities somewhere and all of Sudden its BDIF. You have to be realistic. IMO the deck is solid, it has everything going for it to be a big deck (a slightly better base Sally would be nice) or a better forum of Energy Acceleraltion (if you would give Sally a Firestarter/extra drop power it would be tier 1) instead of this where it needs another stage 1 benched to be reliable. I will almost guareente this thing will top mulitble cities and even win a few. However I don't think it will do it big competive areas.
A win is a win. I'll agree with this, back in the day of Gym Challenges winning a 15 person Gym Challenge and winning an 80 person Gym Challenge both got you a trip to Worlds. However I'll disagree with the period part. Winning a small/non competive cities is not the same as winning one in Flordia or California. I agree people will bring there best deck this is back to competive vrs non competive areas. Player A's best deck might be a well built Salamence while Player B's best deck might be Scizor/Cherrium or even a modified structure. Look at Cities to see what is good you have to go beyond deck A won a cities. You have to look at where, size, and level of compeition.
I'm not by any means down talking winning a cities or top cutting both are impressive in any area. All i'm trying to say is be realistic in what top cutting a cities means. Winning one or even two cities does not instantly catipult a deck or a player to the top.