Arcanine/Arbok Master
New Member
1540.
I’m going to die the same way Akane did…
Ugh I had a huge post typed up in the Reply Box then lost it by accidentally changing pages…here is post v2.0 anyways.
I was definitely the man in the barracks. I honestly am a little confused about that: the way I understand my role, I should have been in the Control Room last night, but I definitely wasn’t because I’m still alive. I guess I was either fortunate that my role didn’t put me in the control room like I thought it would or (unlikely I think) some other role stopped mine.
Vote JellyFisher: I have been making lists of the people who voted for the person who was lynched every day. We have been seeing a lot of townies get lynched, so I figured I could find some voting patterns and eventually would find wolves from that. Jellyfisher voted for the person who was ultimately lynched ALL FIVE TIMES. On days 2,4, and 5 he was one of the first three people to get on that vote-wagon. TODAY he has also done that. On days 1 and 3, he joined the vote about half way through. This seems to me like jellyfisher is getting on vote-wagons at the right time to get the votes rolling off in the direction of a non-wolf. This could also make sense if he is a sith and not a wolf.
These people are showing up a lot on the list of people who vote for the person who was lynched every day: Toxictaipan (4/5), pokechamp(4/5) I would not mind seeing one of them lynched today when it comes down to it. I’ll have more complete theories once I update my list of known roles and apply it to my vote pattern analysis.
About redados1: I think he is telling the truth about the modkill if he reveals too much. So he probably has a role preventing him from talking about his. Does he also have a role forcing his vote? Is he being targeted by 2 separate negative roles? I think it may be more likely that it is really the same role affecting his vote and his role. If he isn’t allowed to talk about his role in any way, shape, or form then he also couldn’t say that we needed to vote for someone because of what his role found out. So we know he is a seer of sorts. Perhaps he has evidence to convict someone, but can’t say it because of the restriction of talking about his role? In that case it may be worth looking into Napoleon some more. As for the legality of using his speech impediment against him, I feel that it is perfectly within the spirit of the game. I don’t, however, see the advantage of doing it right now.
Finally, I don't believe the theories that the Sith marks are a mark of death. I believe the two people who died with them died because the ship collapsed. I think they just happened to have the mark and be in the wrong rooms at the wrong time.
Dragonclyne: thank you for the abridged version of the update. It’s much easier to reference than the original.
Jpulice: What reasons do you have for suspecting toxictaipan of being a townie?
I’m going to die the same way Akane did…
Ugh I had a huge post typed up in the Reply Box then lost it by accidentally changing pages…here is post v2.0 anyways.
I was definitely the man in the barracks. I honestly am a little confused about that: the way I understand my role, I should have been in the Control Room last night, but I definitely wasn’t because I’m still alive. I guess I was either fortunate that my role didn’t put me in the control room like I thought it would or (unlikely I think) some other role stopped mine.
Vote JellyFisher: I have been making lists of the people who voted for the person who was lynched every day. We have been seeing a lot of townies get lynched, so I figured I could find some voting patterns and eventually would find wolves from that. Jellyfisher voted for the person who was ultimately lynched ALL FIVE TIMES. On days 2,4, and 5 he was one of the first three people to get on that vote-wagon. TODAY he has also done that. On days 1 and 3, he joined the vote about half way through. This seems to me like jellyfisher is getting on vote-wagons at the right time to get the votes rolling off in the direction of a non-wolf. This could also make sense if he is a sith and not a wolf.
These people are showing up a lot on the list of people who vote for the person who was lynched every day: Toxictaipan (4/5), pokechamp(4/5) I would not mind seeing one of them lynched today when it comes down to it. I’ll have more complete theories once I update my list of known roles and apply it to my vote pattern analysis.
About redados1: I think he is telling the truth about the modkill if he reveals too much. So he probably has a role preventing him from talking about his. Does he also have a role forcing his vote? Is he being targeted by 2 separate negative roles? I think it may be more likely that it is really the same role affecting his vote and his role. If he isn’t allowed to talk about his role in any way, shape, or form then he also couldn’t say that we needed to vote for someone because of what his role found out. So we know he is a seer of sorts. Perhaps he has evidence to convict someone, but can’t say it because of the restriction of talking about his role? In that case it may be worth looking into Napoleon some more. As for the legality of using his speech impediment against him, I feel that it is perfectly within the spirit of the game. I don’t, however, see the advantage of doing it right now.
Finally, I don't believe the theories that the Sith marks are a mark of death. I believe the two people who died with them died because the ship collapsed. I think they just happened to have the mark and be in the wrong rooms at the wrong time.
Dragonclyne: thank you for the abridged version of the update. It’s much easier to reference than the original.
Jpulice: What reasons do you have for suspecting toxictaipan of being a townie?
