Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

BLG(Blaziken FB-Luxray GL-Garchomp C)

The General-just lol at the last few posts, honestly i know my matchup rating might be odd(usually listed as percentages) but i think that most are pretty correct

Barkjon- Thanks.
 
Agreeing this is basically LuxChomp + Blaziken FB tech. But then again, you can argue 99% of all SP decks are Garchomp C and its Lv X + filler SP Pokemon and a 2-1 Uxie line, so in that regard, it's a moot point.

As for the article itself, looks good and well written.
 
I like to play a 2-1 lux, 2-1 blaze and 2-2 chomp. just a personal preference i guess...

nice article, i love the extensive matchup section!
 
Regis Neo- True dat. Thanks for the compliments as well.

konpacz-I put the 2-1 Blaziken FB as a "tech", i prefer to tech in some extra things. The 2-1 Lux i have seen played but as of right now i don't support due to the trainer locking, so if i play 2-2, i can bright look twice without using a trainer. Thanks for the compliment on the matchup section.
 
Really nice article. I'm currently running this and planning to stick it out for the whole season, this article was a great help.
I'm going to try the Sableye idea :)
 
pokemandan-Thanks, and i am glad to know that my article has helped you out. Good luck.

also added Honchkrow SV as a tech today
 
Last edited:
Lehuere said:
I am going to be mean, your list fails mine is better. :D less fail more facts
Click to expand...

How about posting your list then if this one is so fail? By posting like this, you contribute ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to the topic at hand. Try taking a look at the rules and posting something relevant please.
 
OMG YOU SUCK! I was making an article and I specifically avoided using BlazeRayChomp because I was playing it. Now everyone will know and be able to counter it. Although the biggest SP in my region is BlazeChomp, so I guess it didn't matter. Oh well.:frown:
 
The new play for SP is Smeargle + Unown Q. You WILL lose every SP matchup if they run it and you don't. I'd take out Lucario GL and Palmers for the 2.
 
Sir Bidoof- Sorry :0 But then again most of the counters are sorta common sense.

darksoulSP-In my area I saw some who had it and some who didn't. I intend to add that as a tech my the end of the day. Also I prolly wouldn't take out the Palmer's because i like the ability to bring back Uxie and Drifblim. Added Smeargle as a tech.
 
Last edited:
CFOURCOLTSFAN said:
Sir Bidoof- Sorry :0 But then again most of the counters are sorta common sense.
Click to expand...

Its okay. I don't actually care that much; just prefer the dramatic entrance. Nice article. My list is different, but I guess BlazeRayChomp does not have to be techy. And I guess I run it more as Luxchomp with Blaziken FB tech, anyways.
 
This is my Pokemon List is anyone cares lol.

Pokemon:
2-1 Blaziken FB LvX
2-2 Luxray GL LvX
2-2 Garchomp C LvX
2-1 Uxie LvX
1 Ambipom G
1 Bronzong G
2 Crobat G
1 Dragonite FB
1 Azelf
1 Chatot
1 Unown Q

Lucario I don't run cause there is like no Machamp/Gyarados here at all.
No Point in using it. Now, I would like to find room for maybe a Smeargle
so I probably will cut Luxury Ball for it. Luxury is great for mirror but with
all the Gengar Vileplume running around it's not worth it. I'm pretty much
0-4 vs Gengar Vileplume with the deck.
 
kekaw2-Thanks

Sir Bidoof- That is true, not all have to be techy, mine just is.

Lord Broly- I like the list, that's close to what my original list was. My personal reccommendation for Smeargle is cut the 2nd Crobat G, i find it be excessive personally.
 
maddox23 said:
Wow, how creative! Sp, who da thunk it, huh?

God, can we at least have some variation? Maybe?

"NO" says the gym.

"Fine" Says I

Time to get to work on my lil rogue Idea I had.
Click to expand...

What is the point of this post?

It reads like a cry for attention :/

True. Anybody can build an SP deck. But, the article gives players some "pro" insight on how to play a specific SP list. You can never have enough strategy insight regardless of the deck.

I welcome the kind of effort he put into that article and I don't really care what list someone puts up, as long as it is accompanied by a great deal of thought and tested strategy suggestions.
 
Rogue Archetype- Thanks.

KingdomHearts- Thanks too.

Maddox23-The fact is that most decks(at least right now) are SP decks so there are going to be articles on them, but thanks for saying that it was a good article.
 
Please keep on Topic for this article. It is fine to have an opinion and Post, as long as it pertains to the Article directly. Stating how the Gym maintains its FP and provides Articles is not applicable to this Article. If you would like to see additional, varied Articles on the FP, please Submit any and all Articles in the Proper Forum fro review!

C4, this Article was very well done and it was a Pleasure to edit with you!! Congrats!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top