losjackal
Technical Administrator
This contributes to the argument that it is much easier to manipulate the odds of a coin flip than a die roll.
psychup2034, let me get this out of the way: I 100% agree with your statement above. I don't know if anyone can even come out and make a case to disagree. Your issue of whether coins should be banned or not goes beyond that though. I'll offer the premise that even though it's easier than manipulating a die, it's still hard to do. (It's easy to TRY and affect the outcome, but having a measurable amount of success when it counts is hard.)
Want my opinion on the matter? I would still want cards to say "flip a coin", so that it's still as easy as possible for kids to informally play the game at home. But I would also support the notion that Premier tournaments ought to require the use of dice. I can't think of why not, other than it's not what the card says, and to supposedly respect Japan's wishes.
rivershock, I have a question: if a coin happens to land on a damage counter and then bounce a certain way, why isn't that acceptable as part of the random outcome? In other words, there is no predetermined outcome that was "altered" by having it happen to strike a foreign object. Do you see what I'm saying?
(The rules do stipulate that if a coin or die lands outside of your play area, that it should be redone. But whatever it strikes inside the play area is fair game and probably also part of the game design to introduce additional variability into the flip outcome...unlike the NFL research article previously cited, where the soft landing of the stadium turf contributes nothing.)