Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

I hate to say I told you so...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I quite agree, Imperial. Holo Blaziken needs to be banned. Blaziken ex can stay, but Firestarter has GOT to GO!!
 
dkates said:
I quite agree, Imperial. Holo Blaziken needs to be banned. Blaziken ex can stay, but Firestarter has GOT to GO!!

For how long? Forever? Or until Eon rotates out? Either way, what you said is completely flawed. It'll completely screw the format over, and you're not even thinking about what it'll do the format. Think about what you said in the above quote and then reply back.

-WOoP
 
What do you mean, screw over the format? And if there is a flaw in my logic, please point it out -- I honestly can't see it. As to for how long it should be banned, I'm not sure, but I don't see much sense in bringing it back when E-on rotates out.
Think about it this way. Just like, for most of Neon (and, if I'm not mistaken, even a lot of the original Modified), tournament-quality decks were mostly either Gatr or anti-Gatr, now the format is basically either Blaze or anti-Blaze. I don't know how you feel about it, but personally, I don't think any Modified format needs a card that makes the balance of power like that.
This is not to say that every card that becomes the basis for a first-tier deck should be banned -- far from it. If we did that, the game would quickly be ruined. I firmly believe that banning a card is something that should only be done if it is absolutely necessary. Even Gardevoir, which, with Gardevoir ex, was dominant in the time between the change to E-on and the debut of Dragons, is not a card I would support banning.
Yes, banning Firestarter would greatly change the format, but I believe it would be a change for the better. Perhaps with Firestarter gone, the deck variety we had when E-on began would return.
 
The format is getting more balanced as counters appear. Blaziken ex can be stopped and then there are decks that beat the anti-blaze decks. They don't need to ban Blaziken RS or ex.
 
Gardevoir, Kingdra ex, and Swampert/Cune would rule. IT'S THE SAME WAY NOW. Instead of Gardevoir being dominant, there's Blaziken, AND SOME WATER. It'd be EXACTLY THE SAME. ONE DOMINATING DECK.

dkates, being a fellow "my collection is extremelly limited" player, I feel your pain in not being able to acquire Blaziken, Rayquaza ex, or Blaziken ex, but if that's the only reason you think they should be banned...

I don't think you really thought about this. Gardevoir beats Amphy, beats Flygon, beats a lot of good shtuffz. Without Blaziken, the format would be the same. It'd be water-fest at Worlds, 'stead o' Blazefest.

Keeping Blaziken is fine. Quit whining and play the game.

Wooper
 
Also, Blaze isn't as powerful as many people are giving it credit for. At the Chicago SC yesterday, there were only about 3-5 Blaze varients, only about 2 or 3 of which were BAR or RAMBO, and I think that only one of them made the playoffs, and that one was in the 2 person 10- group. Gardevoir and Swampert were the dominant decks here.
 
In the Florida State Championship yesterday, the winner of 10 and under played Blazekin.

The top 2 11-14 played Blazekin.

The winner (and 3 of the top 4) 15+ played Blazekin.

Looks like we're all playing Blazekin.
 
Last edited:
SuperWooper said:
dkates, being a fellow "my collection is extremelly limited" player, I feel your pain in not being able to acquire Blaziken, Rayquaza ex, or Blaziken ex, but if that's the only reason you think they should be banned...
Not... at... all. Even if I had 4 of them, I'd still favor banning it. I take offense that you think I would be so selfish in my reasoning.

SuperWooper said:
I don't think you really thought about this. Gardevoir beats Amphy, beats Flygon, beats a lot of good shtuffz. Without Blaziken, the format would be the same. It'd be water-fest at Worlds, 'stead o' Blazefest.
Maybe, but rogues seem to tend to have better chances against Gardevoir than they do against Blaze. Besides, Gardevoir decks can be fairly easily beaten with the right tech. I should know, I've both used and played against Gardevoir. Blaze decks, you have to focus the deck on beating it.

SuperWooper said:
Gardevoir, Kingdra ex, and Swampert/Cune would rule. IT'S THE SAME WAY NOW. Instead of Gardevoir being dominant, there's Blaziken, AND SOME WATER. It'd be EXACTLY THE SAME. ONE DOMINATING DECK.
Actually, you've listed 3 decks, and I don't think Gardevoir would dominate Kingdra ex and Swampert/Cune that badly. A situation like that, even though I do not have the cards to build a good version of any of those decks, is the kind of Modified I'd like to see.
 
Today we had our CC and the decks of nr 1,2,3,4 were all Gardevoir(ex) decks, didn't see one blaziken made it in the 15+

In 10- nr's 1+2 blazieken(ex), Aqua Manectric + rayquaza or Entei EX.

11-14 Sceptech deck ruled unbeaten.

So I don't think Blazieken (ex) will be a hype that long, watch out for Gardebomb.
 
Top 6 in CO for 15+ were:

3 of 6 Gardy (3 of 4 in the top 4)

1 BAR speed (4 X Multi)

1 BAR/BEX (me)

1 anti-Fire, anti-Psychic (Swampert/EX/Dark)

My BAR/BEX only finish 5th with two loses to Gardy.

So, IMO, Gardy/Wobby still rules.
 
On the way back home I was thinking about a new deck, because always gardevoir is not my style.

swampert EX + Sceptile (nrg trans) and that's what I'm goingto try out coming weeks.
 
The City Championship have just finished in Hong Kong ...
The 15up champion using a Garcatty deck...
(I'm not sure other champions use wt deck. But nobody use Blaziken o_O)

But anyway, I'm willing to attend the National Cham in 30th May and I hope can see all u guys at world :D

The quality of Hong Kong player is not that good, so I think getting the ticket is not that difficult.
 
Last edited:
Heh, we all are guilty of playing Blaziken. Blaziken ex is what killed me in the finals, but then again, Blaziken ex is what carried me to the finals, anyways! Other than against Xeno (Salamence player) and Mr. Bye, Bex was my main hitter. Little kiddies, it's allllll blaziken now!

I think I'm giving up Blaziken for now. I'm going to go back to my roots and I'll win with rogue decks, as opposed to all this cheap crap.
 
I beg to differ with banning Blaziken. Yesterday at Florida SC I beat 3 out of 4 of the Blaziken variants I played with Gex/Gardy and took 7th . If we banned Blaziken , Gardevoir would just take his place and everyone would be complaining about that. Alhtough it was REALLY boring playing 4/6 of my games against the same deck. It wouldn't matter to me if Blaziken was banned as long as the game got more fun to play. I'm sorry but I do have all of the cards to make a Blaziken deck I just chose to not join the bandwagon (Like with ***trs's reign, I played Anti-***tr).
 
EnjoiPandaPoo said:
I beg to differ with banning Blaziken. Yesterday at Florida SC I beat 3 out of 4 of the Blaziken variants I played with Gex/Gardy and took 7th . If we banned Blaziken , Gardevoir would just take his place and everyone would be complaining about that. Alhtough it was REALLY boring playing 4/6 of my games against the same deck. It wouldn't matter to me if Blaziken was banned as long as the game got more fun to play. I'm sorry but I do have all of the cards to make a Blaziken deck I just chose to not join the bandwagon (Like with ***trs's reign, I played Anti-***tr).

But in the end, Florida SC was won with a Blaziken Deck. I for one ran Ninken and got 6th so yeah, Blaziken is still a threat.
 
Kyogre- Of course Blaziken is still a threat ;/. BTW did you get 6th in 11-14? I was in 11-14. That would be cool if I saw you there but didn't notice cause I don't remember seeing any Ninikens around.
 
you know what im going to love to do


plop my fat expensive BEX deck down right next to me in the Gym challenge

and then promptly wip out my aggronEX deck (or maybe InSaNiTy...havent decided) and have some red face paint fun :)

every round im a be like.....see here is my low blow deck that you can buy a win with if you have $70....(just to prove that i have the ablitly to play one, and the knowlege to know what is good) but im a play this nice ORIGINAL!!!!!!!!!!! MY OWN CREATION!!!!!!!! deck


:D :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top