ZAKtheGeek
New Member
I imagine people want to have an idea of how it won. Just knowing what pokemon it's centered around doesn't really tell the whole story.
Pidgeotto Trainer said:I'm pretty sure Whicker gave the title Monarchy in a gym topic, and it stuck. I think multiple people were starting to put King+Queen together at that time though.
Shiloh Phoenix said:Ive got a SD for cities!
PikaPower56 said:Does anyone have the most commonly used decklist for the Raichu/Eggs deck? If you do, please send it to me.:smile: I want to see if I could even build it.:tongue:
Patriarch said:Oxymoron, J.J.
Some decks have such obvious strategies that we know PCL practically made them for us (Monarchy, Dragtrode, Rocklock, etc). Most other decks are a combined collaboration of anywhere from a few people to a few thousand people. Deck engines are the same way.
jkwarrior said:BAHHHHHHHHH!!
People are sheep.
If you look at the trade thread, everyone HAS TO HAVE a raichu d. It was like that with Flareon ex, Steelix ex, Lugia ex, Mew ex/Manetric ex...
People, be a little original please.
Why does everyone have to jump on the raichu d bandwagon? Instead of trying to copy the deck, try to come up with a deck that can beat it and all of the other decks in the format.
Am I the only one who this frustrates?
rofl. , anyways, it seems to me that there are 3 types of people on this gym. The elites, being the high tourney winers and the creaters of new archetypes. The by standards, the ones who take advice from the elites but stick to rogue and teched decks. And the leeches, the ones that copy every new good deck and try to win with it without knowing the strat of it.ZAKtheGeek said:It seems to me like new, good secks are usually perfected by communities rather than individuals. Boards and apprentice (or similar) are instrumental to this process.
Umbreon777 said:I dont necessarily care what does good. I just want to find a deck that I was meant to play and try to do good with IT. Leeches are so dumb. They are so caught up in winning that they forget the true meaning of the game.
Daddiursa said:There is a 4th group. As ZAKtheGeek points out, the secks, or rather the lucksacks, the ones who copy a great deck and wins with it on pure luck w/o having a clue. These are the guys we are afraid of when we bash the netdeckers. I am I not utterly and inarguably correct?