ShadowCard
Active Member
Yeah, you really can't look at just one storm. However, you don't need thousands of years of data. The last 100 will do, and you could even get away with the last 10-20 years.I meant to say caused, not related. It could be related, but you can't say 1 storm = global warming. That's more or less what I meant to say.
...
One storm doesn't prove or disprove anything. When looking at evidence for global warming, you must look over THOUSANDS of years of data.
"Global warming" really is the wrong way to go about it. You've got to think about observable evidence. No need to make a model showing thousands of years of temperatures.