Tables said:
[stuff]
The bolding is mine, which is where I would like clarification.
The whole paragraph (except the underlined part) does not sit right with me. It may simply be a "wording" issue as to how my mind perceives it and translate's it's meaning. The bolded part stuck out, I get the vibe that mentioning that part (bolded) is already like he is saying that he know's the pre-planned. Then again, it could be general statement of what is known to be common/normal for WW games. But not each game is the same, nor are the rules the same every time as well. After reading that part, my mind was "And you know there is pre-game planning?"- so, I would like clarification is all.
The first part is sort of: "I know nothing, except what is of my own"- which is a simple starting point of showing that in the start, I know my info, yet I know nothing. Common for people to say when other little info is known or shared.
Then, comparing what he knows to the rest of the town- how can you compare so quickly at the start of the game? Seems that you know something, yet you want to say that the town knows only so much only to what can be compared to when nothing is know except for roles have been sent out and begin.
Of course the mafia knows information. Plain and simple statement to the obvious in the begining of the game for those who know the game mechanics as simple rules and the sort.
Then the bolded part- it stuck out and that struck me odd is all- I already spoke on that, so- next part of the paragraph:
You say we do not have much to do. There is plenty to do. If there is not much to do so early, why state that? Seems like you know enough to say something like that. Like, you know who is town and who is not, so why start off with anything larger to do then RVS? It just seems odd to say there is not much to do, yet, it just comes off that you do not need to work so hard in finding scum.
I don't mind pushing to get more serious postings, so this posting of yours is in need of clarification please so that I can have a better understanding behind why this post sticks out so odd to me.
The underlined part- I agree with. That is the only part of the paragraph that did not sit funny with me.
This is just my mind's way of looking at this posting. I figure it is best to get clarification is all and to see if my mind is just looking at this posting in the incorrect manner by taking the post as flip-floppy in parts or just simple conversation trying to point in a good direction.
Tables, please clarify.
Nothing else sticks out at this time, besides the replacements and some postings to look through, all I have at this time.