Lugia, you completely wrong about the attackers in Plasma Klinklang being useless.
FSULugia didn't say that, you did. -_-
You insist that
Landorus EX is "useless"; so far people are disagreeing with you. A few have pointed out that it is no more "useless" than cards you are championing... that doesn't mean they think said cards are useless, but that they think you are wrong about
Landorus EX.
Cobalion Ex has the advantage of being able to discard Special Energy like Plasma Energy which will become incredibly important when Plasma Energy comes out and another attack that does 100 damage and isn't affected by Eviolite, Rescue Scarf and the steel resistance on electric types.
Emphasis added by me.
Rescue Scarf does nothing to alter damage; it kicks in after all damage is done and alters the destination of a Pokémon, rerouting it from the discard pile to the hand.
Discarding Special Energy cards is important, but not every
Landorus EX deck uses them, let alone relies on them for
Landorus EX itself. Remember
Landorus EX, the focus of this thread?
Otherwise... who is saying
Cobalion EX will not have at least some use, possibly quite a bit? Oh yeah... you are, as you argue with people not here. :lol:
Cobalion NVI first attack does pretty well for just 2 energy and it's second attack does 80 damage while preventing the defending Pokemon from attacking meaning non-Ex Pokemon must retreat or be knocked out on the next turn.
Many decks already run
Darkrai EX,
Keldeo EX, or a combination of both just for the purpose of shedding effects such as that of "Iron Breaker". Those that don't usually have some other form of "retreat aid", including something as simple as running a few copies of
Switch. Likely we will also get
Escape Rope next set as well, another single card, Item based method of countering this approach.
At the same time, I am not claiming thatsaid
Cobalion is not worth playing; I haven't tested yet and do not know, and there will be match-ups where its attacks (and fact that it is not a Pokémon-EX) will come in quite handy.
Registeel which can be used as a tech does some serious bench damage.
...and?
In summary, this deck is far from useless and are MUCH better than Sigilyph.
Again, the only one calling the deck useless is you.
Otherwise this statement is "apples to oranges";
Sigilyph (
EX: Dragons Exalted 52/124) is a single card. Not a deck. "Quad Sigilyph" is a deck; I don't know if it will be a strong deck again or is only good when you can find a metagame ill-equipped to deal with it (or be fortunate enough to avoid the decks that are well equipped).
As explained on different sites by different people...
That is incredibly vague and basically useless in a debate; this is the internet and it is quite common to find substantial report for differing views, even minority ones that have little to no evidence in favor of them and a significant amount against.
If you want to cite the work of others, go ahead. Even a general "I was reading on [insert website/], will be helpful. If you do want to be vague, just realize that its anecdotal and can't be treated as this concretely established fact. As an example, I'll regularly mention "I've been reading some reports, and they pain [insert deck/] as struggling.
If that is true, then should you..." and sometimes I'll bring it up and flat out ask those on the thread if they believe I got a bad report.
Eels are dropping in popularity incredibly fast.
No, but they are dropping in popularity, and in some areas quite quickly. "incredibly fast" is an overstatement.
Sure Darkrai pretty popular but nowhere near as popular Keldeo/Blastoise and it's popularity is dropping as well.
This sentence is confusing.
Darkrai EX decks are amazingly popular. Try actually counting how many
Darkrai EX variants are doing well. Not just stuff with a
Darkrai EX on the Bench, but decks where it is so important its a part of the name given to it in reporting. You'll find the numbers for the two a lot closer, with
Keldeo EX mostly represented by just one deck (with
Blastoise).
Avoid misreading drops in popularity as indication that a card isn't good. When you have a good card, and a second similarly good card comes out, there are still only so many players (and decks) that will be seen in a tournament. While
Darkrai EX focused decks aren't as big of a percentage of decks as they were, the primary reason for that is there are other strong (and even not-as-strong rogue decks) that are taking a piece of the pie. Oh, and
Landorus EX, the card you mentioned as useless, has made running it a bit more risky.
Otaku, how are my arguments flawed?
How are your arguments flawed?
1) You will compare and contrast things as if they were of the same kind when they are not; you cannot compare a single Pokémon and to a deck in order to evaluate the viability of one or the other.
2) When comparing two Pokémon or two decks, you must use similar amounts of resource investment. This is especially true with commonly used supporting cards that are easy to play and require few resources, like
Eviolite, or have similarly easy to play and run counters... like
Eviolite, which is often discarded by a
Tool Scrapper.
3) Cherry-picked scenarios can be used, but must be recognized as such, and still can't be used for broad comparisons; with the right scenario nearly any deck can be any other deck, let alone any single Pokémon defeat another. Using "ideal" scenarios proves useful when you provide them for the card you are arguing is going to be defeated... and with everything going for it is still defeated. It can also be useful for explaining general principles such as "Yes, this is an ideal scenario, but the point is it can be done!".
4) You are prone to exaggeration and hyperbole, to a level where it becomes misinformation or outright falsehoods.. which brings us to your final words:
I do understand the terminology I'm using and I did mean incredibly easy when it came to how fast Keldeo/Blastoise could set up.
Setting up a Stage 2 Pokémon on the Bench, backing up a Pokémon EX as well as having at least three Energy cards attached to said Pokémon-EX is not "incredibly easy". It is actually fairly challenging in the current format.
For
Blastoise/
Keldeo EX decks, it is "easier" than many others;
Squirtle has an Ability to block Bench damage it would otherwise receive and
Keldeo EX has its "Rush In" Ability to allow it to promote itself to the Active position from the Bench, and for a spare copy to change out with another in order to avoid an early game KO. This in turn makes it less likely
Squirtle will be left in the Active position, the one place it is vulnerable to straight forward damaging attacks.
Skyla makes grabbing Trainers from the deck much easier, which makes the somewhat common trick of Stage 2 backed decks that don't have a good first turn attacker relying on
Tropical Beach more effective as well as the near universal plan of using
Rare Candy to Evolve into a Stage 2 Pokémon as soon as the rules allow. You're still giving up a Supporter when you do that, plus the other normal draw backs of such plays, so calling that "easy" is misleading; an overstatement or exaggeration at best.
A truly easy set-up is a deck that just needs to get a Basic Pokémon with an Energy card out. That is about as easy as it gets in this game, and some competitive decks come awfully close (usually just wanting a few other Basic Pokémon in hand or on the Bench
). We've had such decks before.
When it comes to more complicated decks than that
... we've still had decks that were easier to set-up than
Blastoise/
Keldeo EX, or were more dominant in the game. Go back and you'll find formats where instead of about 10% of the first place wins belonging to a single distinct deck archetype, 90% did!
rcxd999, you may have some good points, but between poor formatting for your posts (try making more distinct sentences and paragraphs, and making sure they read clearly), hyperbole, incomplete arguments, and even some potential strawmen (or else gross misunderstandings of what others are saying), it is very hard to see any such valid points.