As it already has. Thanks for stating the obvious.
I’ve never missed an STS or Worlds invite in any season that I’ve played competitively. Additionally, I have an over 50% cut rate at U.S. Nationals and Worlds, 100% cut rate at Gym Challenges/Regionals, and I’ve only ever missed 1 cut at States.
I’m often in a situation where I’m actually winning (77% win rate this season), and of course, I wouldn’t know what you mean by “missing an invite.”
If you think that suggesting a Top 32 cut when there are 127 players (most 5-2s miss) is “unintelligent,” “impractical,” or “illogical,” then I think it’s clear that you’re not familiar with the concerns of players. In other worlds, you're a little out of touch.
I think you could take a bit of your own advice. Next time you decide to make a counterargument, make sure what you’re posting doesn’t make you seem unintelligent or illogical. Ask any of the Florida Masters that you know who qualified for Worlds this year. “Before round 1, would you rather have had Top 32 at Worlds this year, or Top 16?” None of them would say Top 16. Absolutely none. (If you manage to find such a player, have them PM me, or PM me yourself.)
Wanting Top 32 at Worlds when there are 120+ players has to be one of the most agreed-upon issues among players. I find it strange that you chose this topic to argue about, while there are many other far more controversial topics where there is actually reasonable dissent. Maybe it's a lack of judgment?
Then think about how asinine you sound when you’re arguing against someone who’s arguing for Top 32 when there are 127 players. Think, then post.