afstandopleren
New Member
That's one of the reasons why a different location of the Worlds would come in handy, if it's in your country, you can go no matter as you won't be inhibited by an not having an Invite.
Wow, congrats, you got me there, this is the first time it's open for all, you coming?
And I don't consider Benelux Cup to be that much of an event since I believe it was organized because the Belgium players don't see much competitive play. But maybe I'm wrong on that last part.
But this is getting off topic, any other responses that are on topic?
I find that comparing US Nationals to any European Nationals is really a bad comparison, mostly due to the size of the countries and the relative rarity of the events involved. The United States has approximately the same land mass and population as Europe (excluding Russia), but there are something like 30 countries in Europe, while there's only one US. Probably a better comparison would be United States Regionals to European Nationals. Doing that, there's actually a pretty fair comparison between the two. I think that US Regionals went from 97 to about 300 last year (average about 160 with one true outlier at 302), and that most European Nationals were slightly lower (30-150, average about 90).
Personally, I'd like to see Worlds fly around the World, but I just don't see that happening, mostly because of the discussion already taken place here about the cost of the stuff they use at Worlds. Again, I was at Nationals, and they probably had an 18-wheeler full of stuff that they *took back* to Seattle with them. I have no idea the amount of stuff they brought with at the beginning. Probably 2-3 18-wheelers. It costs a LOT of money to ship that much stuff one way (my cousins moved from South Africa to Chicago, BIG expense shipping two crates of stuff here), much less two across an ocean.
Quite a few things. Shall I list them?And what, just what don't we have in Europe that America does have. It seems to me like they are ignoring Europeans because the player base in America is bigger and there is no European equivalent of PUI.
Actually its a very good argument. 2,476 players from Europe and Africa have played in the 2008-2009 tournament season so far. In the US alone there have been 7,659 players who have played in a tournament this season. That is more than TRIPLE the number of players from Europe. If you compare North America to Europe and Africa the gap is even bigger. 8,817 players have played in a tournament in the 2008-09 season.I find the 'Bigger player base in America' argument a very weak one.
1. Worlds is run by PUI. PUI stands for Pokemon USA Inc. PUI is in the United States, so it makes sense for them to keep the tournament here.Please do. Otherwise I won't get it.
Why does it matter if they're obvious. Your exact quote was:I want more, you are stating the obvious with those three and they've been noted already in this thread.
I didn't notice any disclaimer in there that what we have that you don't have can't already have been in this thread, or that it can't be obvious. You are just ignoring anything that happens to be a good reason to have Worlds in the US. The US has 5,183 more players than Europe does. That's 5,183 reason why it should be here.And what, just what don't we have in Europe that America does have. It seems to me like they are ignoring Europeans because the player base in America is bigger and there is no European equivalent of PUI.