Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

9/11. The Fall of World Trade Center. (title edited)

because jet fuel dont burn hot enough to melt steel.

its posted in my links and other peoples links as well.

basically everyone on earth will tell you that.
 
According to the article sandslash posted, it was aluminum, or some compound of aluminum with other stuff in the air or the plane. Occam's Razor says that makes more sense than a bunch of guys sneaking several tons of explosives into a building.

The article also further states that there was more than enough energy in the heat of whatever fuels were in the building, along with the chemical reactions already taking place due to the heat of the burning fuel, to melt steel anyway. Not to mention, a bomb big enough to melt that steel would have to be large enough to clear out the area for 10 blocks.
 
Last edited:
Articjedi said:
According to the article sandslash posted, it was aluminum, or some compound of aluminum with other stuff in the air or the plane. Occam's Razor says that makes more sense than a bunch of guys sneaking several tons of explosives into a building.

The article also further states that there was more than enough energy in the heat of whatever fuels were in the building, along with the chemical reactions already taking place due to the heat of the burning fuel, to melt steel anyway. Not to mention, a bomb big enough to melt that steel would have to be large enough to clear out the area for 10 blocks.
Click to expand...

Depends on what the bomb is made of.

The Oklahoma city bombing consisted of bombs the size of ordinary boxes and it blew the entire side off that building and it did melt steel.

That bombing didnt clear out 10 blocks.
 
Bullet said:
because jet fuel dont burn hot enough to melt steel.

its posted in my links and other peoples links as well.

basically everyone on earth will tell you that.
Click to expand...



Ok show me the links....
and I want a stated sentace from everyone on earth telling me that as well
 
dude if you dont even know about this, you shouldnt be arguing about anything 9/11 related.

It proves you havent looked at anything outside what the media has told you.
 
I don't listen to the media. I hate the news.

I looked at the situation
I analyzed the facts.
I applied them

I beat you in arguments.
Your denying it proves nothing

etc. etc.
I have a lot better things to do then to play this game with a lunatic.
So, I'm out.
Have fun sitting on the streets with a sign on your back telling everyone your conspiracy theorys.

and I guess the thread proved one thing about some people.

Ignorance is Blissey
 
Last edited:
It IS weird that the FBI seized all recordings of the pentagon crash, and to this day, refuses to release them. As taxpayers, who funded the construction of the building and pay for its continuing operations, we deserve to have the right to watch it get blown up.

Then again, it makes sense that they'd seize all of those tapes -- considering all of the classified materials floating around behind those walls. They probably didn't want anyone to see the twenty foot tall firebreathing T-rex that shoots lazers from its eyes and patrols the pentagon's inner sanctum, either.
 
Last edited:
Bullet said:
Depends on what the bomb is made of.

The Oklahoma city bombing consisted of bombs the size of ordinary boxes and it blew the entire side off that building and it did melt steel.

That bombing didnt clear out 10 blocks.
Click to expand...

Um... lets look at the facts.

The Oklahoma City bombing was caused by 108 50-pound bags of Ammonium Nitrate, with a gasoline or Nitromethane primer.

Not a normal bomb, by any means, and certainly not a conventional explosive.
 
I dont think all of that went off at once though.

point is, bombs are capable of doing it, and demolition companies who set charges will have bombs that will melt steel.
 
What are you talking about?

Of course it all went off at once, they were all in the same truck!

Still, how can you even say it's steel without doing a spectroscopic analysis on the molten metal. They all look the same when they are molten...
 
Yah, bombs are capable, but saying that a bomb did it introduces so many logical flaws, saying that the WTC was demolished is more improbable than saying it was destroyed by the planes.
 
Sandslash7 said:
What are you talking about?

Of course it all went off at once, they were all in the same truck!

Still, how can you even say it's steel without doing a spectroscopic analysis on the molten metal. They all look the same when they are molten...
Click to expand...

I recall news media (if you can believe them) state that their was several boxes of bombs that never went off as the Bomb squad was called in on this.
 
My friend lived in Oklahoma, and he says that the news media reported that, but in fact, those reports were faulty, because as the police were going through the building pulling out the dead and living, and came across what they THOUGHT was a bomb. SEVERAL TIMES. The actual bomb, was like I said, ONE Ryder truck full of Ammonium Nitrate. It all went off at once.
 
bullet, if the only reason you think 9/11 was an inside job is "omg steal duznt melt" then you clearly have not looked at the other facts

have you thought about how the initial explosion couldve been hotter than the fires that occured after? the explosion would have a very high amount of force upon impact along with the explosion

so the steel would have been weakened upon impact as well...
 
Since when does jet fuel need to be hot enough to burn through steel? The impact of the passenger plane (going at full speed too btw)would heavily weaken the steel structure already and it eventually collapsed under the upper floor's weight. And anyways, the fires would be burning through anything else that is not the steel structure. It is not just steel between floors...

Screw, if it was even a conspiracy plot, why even crash a plane into the building? Why not just sneak the bombs in the building, run out, kaboom, and saying OMG TERRORISTS afterwards? Certainly, it does not take as much resources to pull off (saving two airplanes there...) and acheive the same results. I do not know about you but it would be too sloppy, even if the government is manipulating us, to ram two jet airliners into two skyscrapers just to scare us... Heck, detonate a nuke in the middle of NYC then! That would cause even more chaos and the US certainly has the resources to pull that off if it wanted to do an inside job.

Simple physics and common sense, folks... 9/11 was real.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top