Absoltrainer
Active Member
errr ok, how does that awnser my question asking for proof on why Jet Fuel will not melt steel.....
According to the article sandslash posted, it was aluminum, or some compound of aluminum with other stuff in the air or the plane. Occam's Razor says that makes more sense than a bunch of guys sneaking several tons of explosives into a building.
The article also further states that there was more than enough energy in the heat of whatever fuels were in the building, along with the chemical reactions already taking place due to the heat of the burning fuel, to melt steel anyway. Not to mention, a bomb big enough to melt that steel would have to be large enough to clear out the area for 10 blocks.
because jet fuel dont burn hot enough to melt steel.
its posted in my links and other peoples links as well.
basically everyone on earth will tell you that.
Depends on what the bomb is made of.
The Oklahoma city bombing consisted of bombs the size of ordinary boxes and it blew the entire side off that building and it did melt steel.
That bombing didnt clear out 10 blocks.
What are you talking about?
Of course it all went off at once, they were all in the same truck!
Still, how can you even say it's steel without doing a spectroscopic analysis on the molten metal. They all look the same when they are molten...