Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

LostGar Hype Discussion - IN HERE ONLY

Status
Not open for further replies.
As they say, u can take a horse to the river to drink, but u cant make the horse drink at the river. U say its slow,I know its not. So as Martin an Fulop would say "A person is smart,People are Dumb" Good luck on Stating Flase facts about a deck that does work Very well vs dark an vs sp. like i said before,Test the list. I just won my league tourny with this Quote on Quote Bad deck. I beat luxchomp T-tar Vilger Mirror, an Dialgachomp 5-0. just build it an try it if u say my list is slow. thank you

---------- Post added 02/27/2011 at 05:49 PM ----------

@ lotad I play test vs Good players, Just try the deck out...Its not slow or lose to sp. Most of u players are just Simple minded an wont see how it works the way i built it.
 
Well, Tad kinda got 3rd at Worlds...so yeah...

The fact is that people are running MORE consistency cards and STILL getting worse starts than you are, so that's where people build their arguements.
 
Do you have Redshark TeamOG? I'd love to play against you with my sablelock and show you what they mean by autoloss
 
No i dont play on Red Shark the % are way to off to play a real game, an i said before i lose to that trash cause of the bird.
@porii sames, ok? he got third at worlds? how long ago. It doesnt mean nothing to me, My testing partner went 14-0 at nats an won, why would i care for a 3rd place players thoughts, Yes he did great,but This is a Different Format than 2006.
 
@porii sames, ok? he got third at worlds? how long ago. It doesnt mean nothing to me, My testing partner went 14-0 at nats an won, why would i care for a 3rd place players thoughts, Yes he did great,but This is a Different Format than 2006.

I'm just saying that you said to Tad Wheeler that you play against "good players", and then I stated that Tad got 3rd at Worlds, 2006. Plus, he's pretty good himself. And you try getting 3rd at Worlds...
 
I'm just saying that you said to Tad Wheeler that you play against "good players", and then I stated that Tad got 3rd at Worlds, 2006. Plus, he's pretty good himself. And you try getting 3rd at Worlds...

I agree but its a different metagame, Everytime i post my brothers List for states up everyone here pokegym people say its bad, an he wins 0.o If he has skype i can play him an test so he can see how the deck runs. I just dont like wen players dont try something if the doubt it in cards.
 
I don't just doubt the cards. I doubt the deck after testing. Just because I haven't tried your exact list does not mean that I don't know what I'm talking about.
 
but it does matter, think about it 06 Meta how many ideas worked when in all theory shouldn't have? Just cause a deck doesn't look right on paper doesn't mean it wont work. I mean, Martin made a Machamp list that look like crap on paper,but he gave it to me an I went 6-0 in swiss rounds with it.

Others list i have seen for lost world have sucked. If u say i lost to sp an all these decks. then build the deck an try it.
 
think about it 06 Meta how many ideas worked when in all theory shouldn't have

But that doesn't mean people thought of crazy ideas like mynx and mewtric and then decided against them just based on thought. They were secret decks. Yours is not secret. We have all been giving actual arguments against your deck and you just keep telling us to "try it". Why would we if you aren't even trying to make a decent case for it.

I don't think it looks bad just on paper, I have tried things very similar to that, and they have been hopelessly unsuccesful, or at least bad.
 
all you guys mostly say is dark this or your slow. u want match ups,%'s? u want the guild on how to play this deck?
 
No i dont play on Red Shark the % are way to off to play a real game, an i said before i lose to that trash cause of the bird.
@porii sames, ok? he got third at worlds? how long ago. It doesnt mean nothing to me, My testing partner went 14-0 at nats an won, why would i care for a 3rd place players thoughts, Yes he did great,but This is a Different Format than 2006.

Lol. Fail excuse is fail. Cool story bro.
 
u wnt that when u guys have no proof on my deck being trash? oh i forgot, its the gym i have to post a strat or u guys cant under stand it
 
You think LoTad can't understand what you're writing? From his stuff it looks like he's a good player, we're wondering how your deck can have such good matchups when the rest of us are struggling to win consistently and get a solid build with the deck. Stop trolling and either post an idea of the list, give some more detailed accounts of your testing, play one of us over Skype or Apprentice if you don't like RedShark or just leave the thread.
 
Nicholas Schutte Skype me

---------- Post added 02/28/2011 at 03:55 PM ----------

thb, i really dont, i showed top players my list an they under stand it an like it, if hes So good then he would understand why it has good match ups

---------- Post added 02/28/2011 at 04:04 PM ----------

If i was Trolling i would have done a way better job then just this
 
If you're gonna troll, be a good one please. You're just wasting your own time here. You're not changing anyones opinion, no one's buying you, and you've been discovered. You took it too far. Get lost. (Haha, I made a pun :p)
 
4 Gastly
3 Haunter
4 Gengar Prime
2 Machop
1 Machoke
2 Machamp
2 Uxie
1 Asself
1 Mr. Mine
1 SpiritTomb
1 Unknown Q
Trainers-24
4 Seeker
3 Rare Candy
3 BTS
3 Lost World
3 Collector
3 Bebe's Search
2 Vs Seeker
2 Twins
1 Luxury Ball
Energy-14
4 Rainbow
10 Psychic

Uh huh. I understand the concept. I'm just not impressed. I don't believe for a second that your list is consistent as you say it is. To get a start up going, the only search cards you have are 3 collector, 3 bebe's, and 1 lux ball. Against a decent sp deck, the bebe's and lux ball won't help you very much, because your set up will likely be sprayed. As long as you are playing against an sp player with half a brain, you will have a very hard time keeping up. All sprays can be saved for your set ups. So if you're lucky enough to topdeck a twins to grab machamp, you may be able to take a prize (possibly screwing up later twins usages). Well, you're now 120 hp machamp is extremly succeptible to an ohko via zen blade. Oh, right. You're going to top deck a second consecutive twins (or 1 of your 2 vs seekers), to grab 2 more needed cards for your second machamp. Premier ball + zen blade number 2. Or, I could just sit back, let you either retreat or take a few more prizes, crippling your twins ability. Without or with very few set ups, you are going to have an impossible time grabbing lost world. Even with the unnecessary count of 3. That's an argument.
 
Lol @ all of you, I have the japanese nats world champions list, and it looks NOTHING like what any of you have. Start thinking outside the box if you wanna win with this deck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top