Slow Deck, as a rebuttal to your argument, I will quote Jon Stewart.
Good to know that liberals are for totalitarianism and socialism at the same time.
Mandatory purchase of a private service does come close to socialism and that is why I am so against it.
At the same time, the republicans have destroyed and humiliated their party at every turn, almost to the point where people are going to vote democrat because they don't see them as lunatics.
http://www.abc15.com
How about a news story of Sarah Palin cheering people on for beating a man who disagreed with her?
http://www.necn.com
Sarah Palin telling people to start confrontations with people who have Obama bumper stickers.
Kind of a reference to this next link.
http://www.thepoliticalcarnival.net
A republican tried to kill innocent people because of an Obama bumper sticker on their car.
People are so anti-republican right now because the repubs have decided to use a person who promotes political terrorism to be the mouthpiece of their party.
How about when Limbaugh (another figurehead of the republicans) urged all members of the military to refuse to follow orders because Obama was a "SEKRITMUSLIMKENYAN!!!111!!"?
They promote acts of violence in order to intimidate those with a political/religious view different from their own.
The saddest part of that sentence is that it applies to Al-qaeda and the Republicans. :nonono:
I will vote for who I think is the better candidate (regardless of their party), but I'm not about to vote for people who turn into terrorists when they lose an election.
Your wagon analogy works very well if you include conservatives who put pits in the middle of the road because they would rather have everything fail than to have somebody else succeed.
Your logic fail kicks into high gear when you say that liberals want to force people to think a certain way, when the conservatives are already resorting to violence against anybody who doesn't think what they want.
I could go on, but I would probably violate forum rules if I pointed out anything else about how horribly flawed your argument is.